oneidabows.net Oneida Bows & American Eagle Bows 2010-11-07T10:12:23-04:00 /forum/feed.php?f=2&t=4214 2010-11-07T10:12:23-04:00 /forum/viewtopic.php?t=4214&p=20460#p20460 <![CDATA[Re: 1992 aero-force vs 1997 tomcat III]]> The center shot rise allows more options down the road on your arrow rest. You have more fletching clearance and less tuning problems with rests such as WB or drop-aways.
As far as the weight, I find that a heavier bow is a little more stable. but that is personal preference. I also use a bow sling going in and out of the woods.
Some sights get real limited to the amount of L/R adjustment. Most are designed for a larger cut out of a center shot riser. You will have a more open sight picture with the Aeroforce.
I wouldn't think of getting rid of mine. She never fails to do her part if I do mine. good luck with which ever one you choose.
JR

Statistics: Posted by bikerjr1 — Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:12 am


]]>
2010-10-30T09:50:58-04:00 /forum/viewtopic.php?t=4214&p=20332#p20332 <![CDATA[Re: 1992 aero-force vs 1997 tomcat III]]> Statistics: Posted by Bowbum — Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:50 am


]]>
2010-10-30T08:03:17-04:00 /forum/viewtopic.php?t=4214&p=20331#p20331 <![CDATA[Re: 1992 aero-force vs 1997 tomcat III]]> Thanks,

John C.

Statistics: Posted by John c — Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:03 am


]]>
2010-10-30T07:43:47-04:00 /forum/viewtopic.php?t=4214&p=20330#p20330 <![CDATA[Re: 1992 aero-force vs 1997 tomcat III]]> The aeroforce has a center shot riser and is shorter.

Statistics: Posted by JOneida — Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:43 am


]]>
2010-10-29T23:06:55-04:00 /forum/viewtopic.php?t=4214&p=20329#p20329 <![CDATA[1992 aero-force vs 1997 tomcat III]]> Thanks guys,

John C.

Statistics: Posted by John c — Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:06 pm


]]>